Each video segment may not exceed 50 MB, and each video clip must be saved as a separate file and clearly identified. Color photographs are preferred. Peer review is at the heart of the scientific process, and in order for the process to work, the review must be rigorous.
I also think it is our duty as researchers to write good reviews. The strengths and weaknesses in medical education reports. The detailed reading and the sense-making process, in particular, takes a long time. Look for areas that have not yet been thoroughly reviewed or areas for which you think you have a fresh take on old data.
I also try to cite a specific factual reason or some evidence for any major criticisms or suggestions that I make. Another strategy is to give part or all of your article to a first-year graduate student or to a scientist in a slightly different field.
Examples of scientific reviews can be found in: Many formats for graphic presentation are acceptable, including graphs, charts, tables, and pictures or videos. Spend some time writing with all your PDFs and Web browsers closed and your desk cleared of any paper. Knowing this in advance helps save time later.
The discussion section should put those results into a broader context. CONTENT Abstract Sometimes written as an afterthought, the abstract is of extreme importance as in many instances this section is what is initially previewed by readership to determine if the remainder of the article is worth reading.
I worked my way backward to a set of about 10 key papers. If there is a major flaw or concern, I try to be honest and back it up with evidence. That was fine with me — as a fifth-year graduate student, I had learned to cope with, and even prefer, extreme independence.
I was running a protein over a nickel column on a Sunday evening in February when my adviser approached me about co-authoring a review article for Annual Review of Biochemistry. The parts of the Discussion I focus on most are context and whether the authors make claims that overreach the data.
Photographs should be clear, free of clutter or extraneous background distractions and be taken with models wearing simple clothing. A review from a second set of trained eyes will often catch these errors missed by the original authors.
I suggest you take notes constantly as you go through the review process. Rather than asking one or two people to help you edit the entire article, break it up into sections and ask a different colleague for his or her expert help in revising just one section on a topic with which you know he or she is familiar.
When I undertook the task of writing a scientific literature review article last year, I had hoped that a Google search would reveal a handful of how-to pages thoughtfully created by veterans of this particular writing process.
If the paper has horrendous difficulties or a confused concept, I will specify that but will not do a lot of work to try to suggest fixes for every flaw.
Figures dramatically enhance the graphic appeal of a scientific paper. So I can only rate what priority I believe the paper should receive for publication today. Does the theoretical argument make sense?
I try to link any criticism I have either to a page number or a quotation from the manuscript to ensure that my argument is understood. Poor placement of content confuses the reader reviewer and may cause misinterpretation of content.Peer review is at the heart of the scientific method.
Its philosophy is based on the idea that one’s research must survive the scrutiny of experts before it is presented to the larger scientific community as worthy of serious consideration. In this class, you will be required to write a scientific review paper.
A secondary research paper or review paper is not a 'book report' or an annotated list of experiments in a particular field, but demands a considerable, complete literature review.5/5(24).
Here you have a to-do list to help you write your review: A scientific literature review usually includes a title, abstract, index, introduction, corpus, bibliography, and appendices (if. Become an expert in an area of a scientific field; Publish multiple papers in that area or at least do extensive research in that area; At the invitation of an Editor to write a review paper for a Journal, provide an expert review of that area in the field in your own unique way, which may include.
A review is meant to be a survey of the current state of a field - and the less you know about a field or topic at the outset, the more work you're going to have to do in order to have an authoritative voice that can provide insight about the research that has been done. Apr 06, · It should certainly have a Conclusions section: what should change as a result of what you have found and discussed in your review?
As with any paper, aim to write clearly and in a way that will be interesting for your intended audience. Aim to write in a way that makes it easy to find and understand your key messages, even for skim-readers.Download